software
Report a problem

New features in OpenOffice.org 3.1, an early look

Andrew Z   on 21 January 2009 - 02:33 · 37 comments & 8832 views

Advertisement (Why?)
OpenOffice.org is an open-source, multiplatform and multilingual office suite comparable with MS Office. With the final release two months away and an alpha version available, it's time to look at OpenOffice.org 3.1's new features: eye candy, better charts, replying to notes in the margin, overlining, macros in Base, RTL improvements for Arabic and Hebrew, and (believe it or not) better sorting. Download and report any bugs you find.

News source: New Features in OpenOffice.org 3.1, an Early Look
Download: Mirrors (Use the article above for special instructions)

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 37 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 Shiranui on 21 Jan 2009 - 04:19
Could have sworn that half of those features were supposed to be in 3.0.
#1.1 tiagosilva29 on 23 Jan 2009 - 09:37
I don't think so.
#1.2 Intelman on 24 Jan 2009 - 18:30
I think so.
(7 replies) #2 seta-san on 21 Jan 2009 - 04:31
New to OpenOffice... WE'RE STILL TRYING TO KEEP UP WITH MICROSOFT
#2.1 XerXis on 21 Jan 2009 - 06:20
seta-san said,
New to OpenOffice... WE'RE STILL TRYING TO KEEP UP WITH MICROSOFT

they both have their place in the market
#2.2 MightyJordan on 21 Jan 2009 - 13:33
XerXis said,
they both have their place in the market

OpenOffice would have a better place in the market if they focus now on new features, and on performance. That's the main problem with OO, and it's also the reason I use Microsoft Office 2007.

Wait, scratch that bit. The biggest problem with OO is the look. It's so ugly. :X
#2.3 C_Guy on 21 Jan 2009 - 16:28
Oh, no no no no. There's just too many features in Microsoft Office to copy over. It would take forever.
#2.4 +TCLN Ryster on 23 Jan 2009 - 15:29
It's not like Office 2007 is super speed either you know. Thats why SP2 is supposed to be focussing alot on performance. Outlook for instance is horrendously slow for most things.
#2.5 Intelman on 24 Jan 2009 - 18:31
Office 2007 is fast in comparison to OO. Night and day.
#2.6 Anim8or on 25 Jan 2009 - 02:37
MightyJordan said,
Wait, scratch that bit. The biggest problem with OO is the look. It's so ugly. :X


Exactly. The look is ugly no matter what OS you're on. It's especially disconcerting on a Mac (Neo Office isn't much better either). They should do what the Firefox team did, and create separate skins for Mac, Linux, and Windows. That's the only reason I still use Word 2008 for Mac, because it looks nicer.
#2.7 excalpius on 25 Jan 2009 - 09:28
Oh goody, another OO update to ignore...
(5 replies) #3 Erikas on 21 Jan 2009 - 06:57
OpenOffice is probably the best "Free" option but I personally won't use it anymore. Our office had 3 PC's with MS Office and a couple more with OpenOffice. Unfortunately the word documents caused many problems when opened in OpenOffice, i.e. crashes, file corruption etc. We had no choice to purchase more MS Office licenses as using word processors are our core business. I must say however that this was quite a few years ago, about 3 years, so obviously OpenOffice must have gotten better a lot during that time and does provide a good alternative for some users.
#3.1 ataris_kid on 21 Jan 2009 - 12:24
Erikas said,
Unfortunately the word documents caused many problems when opened in OpenOffice, i.e. crashes, file corruption etc.


Was that before the .docx format was available in MS Office? OO seems to do much better with the newer format.

Last edited by ataris_kid on 21 Jan 2009 - 12:35
#3.2 Erikas on 22 Jan 2009 - 06:51
ataris_kid said,
Was that before the .docx format was available in MS Office? OO seems to do much better with the newer format.



No it was with office 2003.
#3.3 roadwarrior on 22 Jan 2009 - 22:23
Our office had 3 PC's with MS Office and a couple more with OpenOffice. Unfortunately the word documents caused many problems when opened in OpenOffice, i.e. crashes, file corruption etc. We had no choice to purchase more MS Office licenses as using word processors are our core business.


Actually, you had a much cheaper option: dump MS Office and go totally with Open Office, since those MS Office documents were the source of the problems.
#3.4 smithy_dll on 23 Jan 2009 - 08:34
Erikas said,
No it was with office 2003.



NO! That is a yes, office 2003 pre-dates Office Open XML (i.e. .docx, .xlsx etc...)

Just wait until MS Office 13, then we can all be happy and finally use ODF co-operatively.
#3.5 tiagosilva29 on 23 Jan 2009 - 09:39
roadwarrior said,
Actually, you had a much cheaper option: dump MS Office and go totally with Open Office, since those MS Office documents were the source of the problems.


Quoted for truth. Only recently Microsoft released part of the specs for the doc/ppt/xls binaries, and since OP was dealing with Microsoft files, OP was just asking for troubles.
#4 rm20010 on 21 Jan 2009 - 17:35
Microsoft-Office-killer? Calling it "alternative" is fine, a killer though... just lol.
(4 replies) #5 LTD on 21 Jan 2009 - 22:50
OpenOffice is FREE.

Office 2007 Pro retails for $420 CDN.

A few features in MS Office that are not present in OpenOffice is a small price to pay for what your are getting for absolutely nothing.
#5.1 rm20010 on 22 Jan 2009 - 02:32
Actually Office 2007 Ultimate costs $64 CAD for post-secondary students via the Ultimate Steal offer. That pretty much negates the need for the $159 Home and Student edition.

High school students and casual home users can get by just fine with OpenOffice. For post-secondary students, it depends on their program.
#5.2 Intelman on 24 Jan 2009 - 18:33
Office Home and Student 2007 comes licensed for 3 PCs and costs 79 dollars.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16832116135

You get PowerPoint Word and Excel, the most used apps.
#5.3 Neoauld on 26 Jan 2009 - 14:48
Intelman said,
Office Home and Student 2007 comes licensed for 3 PCs and costs 79 dollars.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx...N82E16832116135

You get PowerPoint Word and Excel, the most used apps.


office costs 10 dollars at my college for enterprise
#5.4 bluarash on 01 Feb 2009 - 05:09
The trouble is that Ultimate steal is available only to individuals who currently have an .edu address (or other select schools without one). As an alumni (an individual that actually graduated), I feel that I have to be entitled to this Ultimate Steal. I can get both Windows Vista Ultimate and Office Ultimate for a little over $130.

Of course that wouldn't make sense because as a graduate you would have a job, and, therefore be able to afford the $600+ price tag. Though in truth, it probably is just easier to get the Office 2007 Enterprise (with valid activation) and that version cost nothing and comes with Visio. Trojan free too, imagine that. Not that I would own such a copy, though I do have a "friend" who does.

BTW... Office student edition is pretty worthless because it is missing Outlook and Access... these are kind of actually important programs.
(2 replies) #6 Raa on 22 Jan 2009 - 05:04
I would never willingly switch back to Microsoft Office now.
#6.1 excalpius on 25 Jan 2009 - 09:29
Guess you must not do professional-level work then...
#6.2 bluarash on 01 Feb 2009 - 05:10
Real men use Vi and MySQL on the CL.
#7 The_Decryptor on 22 Jan 2009 - 13:13
Oh thank god, we've finally got the Cairo drawing.
(1 reply) #8 Shiranui on 23 Jan 2009 - 03:04
Final release date?
#8.1 Angel Blue01 on 23 Jan 2009 - 23:20
In 65 days
(2 replies) #9 Angel Blue01 on 23 Jan 2009 - 23:19
Hurray! Grammer checking and outlines are finally useable, how about SVG support?
#9.1 Intelman on 24 Jan 2009 - 18:34
Grammar.
#9.2 BilliShere on 24 Jan 2009 - 22:18
LOL!!!
#10 tablet_user on 25 Jan 2009 - 05:07
(3 replies) #11 Rolith on 25 Jan 2009 - 07:42
OpenOffice.Org: We tried to sell it, it failed. So we gave it away for free, and no one wanted it. Now we're trusting the open-source cult to spread the word that no one particularly wants to hear. The people unwilling to pay $80 for software that's more than worth it (office 2007) are the same people perfectly capable of getting it for free. The ONLY people I know that aren't using some form of MS Office on their PC are Open Source devotees.

Nothing wrong with opensource mind you...look at what it did with firefox and ubuntu...but it hasn't produced a good office suite worth a thing.
#11.1 pyther on 26 Jan 2009 - 23:32
Rolith said,
OpenOffice.Org: We tried to sell it, it failed. So we gave it away for free, and no one wanted it. Now we're trusting the open-source cult to spread the word that no one particularly wants to hear. The people unwilling to pay $80 for software that's more than worth it (office 2007) are the same people perfectly capable of getting it for free. The ONLY people I know that aren't using some form of MS Office on their PC are Open Source devotees.

Nothing wrong with opensource mind you...look at what it did with firefox and ubuntu...but it hasn't produced a good office suite worth a thing.


As much as I don't care for microsoft, if they made a linux version of office I would probably more than likely pick up a copy. Powerpoint is a superior program than Impress. However, I don't have a Windows licensees, and I can get by with openoffice so that is exactly what I use.
#11.2 Rolith on 27 Jan 2009 - 06:10
wine + office 2003 (not sure bout 07...) works better then open office does... NO performance hit that I can tell.
#11.3 jstillion on 27 Jan 2009 - 18:41
StarOffice is the "paid" competitor, OpenOffice is the free to give away. The only reason they charge for StarOffice is the compulsion companies have to having to pay for software and shy away from the word "free".

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)