main
Report a problem

AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition review

Julio Franco   on 23 April 2009 - 06:11 · 17 comments & 5824 views

Advertisement (Why?)
AMD kick started 2009 with guns blazing introducing their latest Phenom II X4 platform on early January. Although the launch was comprised of just two processors, that's all AMD needed to compete head to head with the Intel Core 2 Quad range.

Today AMD is releasing two new processors, the Phenom II X4 955 and 945, which are based on the same "Deneb" architecture though with a few notable changes. The most prominent change is that these are AM3 processors, and therefore can be used with either DDR2 or DDR3 memory. AM3 processors are also completely backwards compatible with AM2+ motherboards.



The Phenom II X4 955 will remain affordable with a suggested initial retail value of $245. This new processor looks as having the potential to be the ultimate upgrade solution for AMD users, as it can be paired with AM2+ motherboards that were released as far back as 2007.

View: AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition review

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 17 additional comments
(1 reply) #1 Digix on 23 Apr 2009 - 08:45
looks nice, if only had spare cash to buy one
#1.1 Fox-HTV on 30 Apr 2009 - 08:33
Tell me about it.
I've had to do the most painful thing of moving to Intel temporarily because it's the only thing that was readily available in trying to maintain a mid-to-high end PC and lets face it, Phenom 1s are just not worth it.
Can't wait till AMDs new chipset is out especially for AM3, not this modded 790, then all my efforts will go towards it.
All my Intel buddies are gloating *grumble, grumble*... :p
(9 replies) #2 Richard Hammond on 23 Apr 2009 - 09:39
Phenom are crap why you would choose one over a Core i7 ill never know, they are barely a match for the current Core based Core 2 Quad architecture.
#2.1 MightyJordan on 23 Apr 2009 - 09:50
Richard Hammond said,
Phenom are crap why you would choose one over a Core i7 ill never know, they are barely a match for the current Core based Core 2 Quad architecture.

Agreed. I took a look at the article earlier and it's nothing special. The only interesting thing about it is that it's backwards compatible with AM2+ motherboards and DDR2 RAM.
#2.2 Recon415 on 23 Apr 2009 - 09:53
Budget, and I dunno.... price/performance?

They are more than a match for the current Core 2 Quad lineup at very competitive. No, they are not as good as the Core i7 line of processors, but they are 400-600$ less as pricey.
#2.3 Digix on 23 Apr 2009 - 11:29
Richard Hammond said,
Phenom are crap why you would choose one over a Core i7 ill never know, they are barely a match for the current Core based Core 2 Quad architecture.


Good bang for buck. Upgradeable. Tried and trusted quality.
#2.4 Intelman on 23 Apr 2009 - 17:43
Support the little guy to keep Intel honest? The Phenom IIs are quite competitive.
#2.5 iamwhoiam on 23 Apr 2009 - 22:32
Richard Hammond said,
Phenom are crap why you would choose one over a Core i7 ill never know, they are barely a match for the current Core based Core 2 Quad architecture.

Because if someone already had an AM2+ board they wouldn't need to upgrade the MB, RAM, CPU and possible the power supply just to go with an i7.

Not everyone needs or wants the latest tech.
#2.6 Ali Koubeissi on 24 Apr 2009 - 06:27
Phenom are crap why you would choose one over a Core i7 ill never know, they are barely a match for the current Core based Core 2 Quad architecture.


Did you even read the article? Phenom II 955 is faster then "Core 2 Quad architecture" in more then 95% of the tests.

And yeah, you'll never know. You don't function properly outside Intel world. Currently, and for the neat future, AMD has the best upgradability path. It's almost close to Core i7 920, and yet it's not limited to some 250$+ motherboard.
#2.7 m.keeley on 25 Apr 2009 - 01:28
No not close to i7, close to core 2 quads. i7's are still way ahead but, of course, they cost.
#2.8 RPDL on 26 Apr 2009 - 15:57
Socket 1366 motherboards cost so much more than AM2+/AM3 ones, and 3gb of DDR3 costs more than 4gb of DDR2 at the same speed. And don't forget that they need more power.

The price difference between i7s and Phenom IIs is quite simply not representative of their unremarkable performance advantage.
#2.9 +dead.cell on 26 Apr 2009 - 21:36
Yeah, I'm just waiting for a bit of a price drop right now for the Phenom II.

Right now, I'm running a Athlon X2 7750, so I'd imagine a huge performance gain when I finally do upgrade it. I just got this machine back in March, but I got it under $500 building it myself (XP Pro from MSDNAA). At least this will keep me with a reasonable machine for the next couple years.
#3 AnthoWin on 23 Apr 2009 - 21:46
+1 affordability
+1 competition (this may sway intel to bring their prices down aka price war)
#4 m.keeley on 23 Apr 2009 - 23:20
Good if you're upgrading but personally wouldn't build a new system with them. They pretty much match Core 2 Quads but also cost about the same, then look at how well the Core 2's overclock (if you're in to that). Actually probably wouldn't go for either and wait for the i7's & motherboards to become cheaper as they blow away both.
(2 replies) #5 BoyaliKus on 29 Apr 2009 - 09:27
Did anyone said AMD? Oh I do not know such a brand since I use laptops
#5.1 Fox-HTV on 30 Apr 2009 - 08:39
What are you talking about? AMD got a stake in the mobile market.
Hmph, if you guys only realized what made Intel what it is, oh well, to each their own...
#5.2 +S/R on 10 May 2009 - 01:34
BoyaliKus said,
Did anyone said AMD? Oh I do not know such a brand since I use laptops


My laptop right now has an AMD in it, as did my previous one. Your comment is worthless.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)