hardware
Report a problem

Intel gives details on new 32nm Westmere processors

Sam Alderwick   on 10 February 2009 - 22:43 · 11 comments & 4371 views

Advertisement (Why?)
In a press release today, Intel gave some more details about its upcoming processor, codenamed "Westmere" – the world's first 32 nanometre microprocessor. The processor is set for release in early 2010, and is a 32nm shrink of the Intel Nehalem micro architecture. Intel also announced that it would be investing $7 billion into new fabrication plants that will use their 32nm manufacturing technology, used to make Westmere and the 32nm processor families that follow.

The processors will be available for desktops, laptops and servers, and will, as the previous families have done, be available in several models (one of which, Intel plans, will feature 6 cores). As mentioned earlier last year, Intel is following a "tick-tock" scheme – first they release a new architecture (which is the "tock"), and then later on they release a smaller, faster version of that, which is "the tick". In this case, Nehalem was the "tock", and Westmere will be the "tick".

However, unlike the previous processor shrinks, where no changes were made to the processor architecture, and the only change was the size, Westmere will add new microcode which Intel claims will enhance encrypting and decrypting capabilities of the processor, and more importantly, Westmere will integrate the graphics controller, which would normally be part of the chipset. This will "increase performance and simplify system manufacturing", according to Intel.

The new processors will be compatible with a new chipset – the Intel 5 Series – due for release in the second half of this year. The processors themselves will be in production by the end of the year, although will be available in early 2010.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 11 additional comments
#1 Minimoose on 10 Feb 2009 - 22:59
Probably an upgrade for me then
(1 reply) #2 Sazz181 on 10 Feb 2009 - 23:01
Unfortunately I've got to go, which is why I couldn't write as much as I would have liked, but for those who are interested, there's some great resources, which go into more detail than most could ask for, on the Intel site:

Steve Smith presenting the new Westmere processor
Intel Westmere Whitepapers
Intel Westmere Fact Sheet
#2.1 jafoman on 11 Feb 2009 - 07:20
Check out that fancy TV mounted on the wall behind him.
(4 replies) #3 TRC on 10 Feb 2009 - 23:40
I don't want a graphics controller integrated into my CPU. I don't even want one on my motherboard.
#3.1 Lucas on 11 Feb 2009 - 00:28
TRC said,
I don't want a graphics controller integrated into my CPU. I don't even want one on my motherboard.


It is probably just to allow some more calculations to be done in the processor without having a video card and improve overall performance. If you want gaming or high end video processing, you'll always need the video card.

Just my view.
#3.2 cycro on 11 Feb 2009 - 00:51
TRC said,
I don't want a graphics controller integrated into my CPU. I don't even want one on my motherboard.


Isn't that an integrated graphics adapter which you do not want? The graphics controller should be the part which controls the adapter, i.e. video card... if I'm not mistaken.
#3.3 TRC on 11 Feb 2009 - 01:21
Oh, that's different then. I read it wrong and thought Intel was integrating one of their onboard video chips into their CPU.
#3.4 Sazz181 on 11 Feb 2009 - 07:43
Yeah, what they've done is moved the graphics controller which would normally be inside the chipset, and moved it into the processor itself. This enhances performance, because data from the graphics controller no longer has to travel along the FSB (although that no longer exists in the latest Intel products).

It's pretty much the same idea as what they did with the memory controller in their i7 range.
#4 ripgut on 11 Feb 2009 - 00:06
I can't wiat for Moore's law to hit a wall, and quantum computing takes over.
(1 reply) #5 dlegend on 11 Feb 2009 - 00:26
Great. That means the core i7s should be significantly lower in price by winter.
#5.1 RPDL on 11 Feb 2009 - 21:45
Yeah, well too bad intel has nothing to offer before the next school year starts.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)