main

Klausner Sues Google and Verizon for Visual Voicemail

Bezhou Feng   on 27 August 2008 - 13:13 · 15 comments & 4093 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Emboldened by settlements with Apple and AT&T, inventor Judah Klausner filed a voicemail patent lawsuit on Tuesday against Google, Verizon Communications, LG Electronics, Comverse Technology, Citrix Systems, and Embarq. Anticipating the attack, Verizon filed its own lawsuit against Klausner two weeks ago in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York that seeks to have a federal judge declare the inventor's visual voicemail patent invalid.

The new case involves claims by Klausner tied to patents in various countries he began receiving in 1992 for "visual voicemail"—applying a graphical way of interacting with voicemail messages that allow it to be used like e-mail. In June, Apple, which recently popularized "visual voicemail" through its hit iPhone device, together with AT&T and eBay, the owner of Web-based calling service Skype, settled a patent suit filed last December by Klausner. Klausner previously sued and won settlements from Time Warner's AOL and Vonage.

View: Full Story at eWeek

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 15 additional comments
#1 Beastage on 27 Aug 2008 - 13:17
Unlike most patent suits , his case seems genuine , all these companies infringed on his patent without compensation ...
#2 Turge on 27 Aug 2008 - 13:41
I still can't believe you can even patent an idea like this. For one, this impacts innovation.
(4 replies) #3 ziggie216 on 27 Aug 2008 - 14:10
is there a patent for a "visual conversation"? If not, I'm going to register that right now....
#3.1 +Orlando Rays on 27 Aug 2008 - 15:58
Now doing this, finding something that is already used but not patented by anybody, is the kind of thing that can get laughed out of court.
#3.2 +Lt-DavidW on 27 Aug 2008 - 18:23
(Orlando Rays said @ #3.1)
Now doing this, finding something that is already used but not patented by anybody, is the kind of thing that can get laughed out of court.

In that case I'm going to file a patent for building a lunar base on the moon.
#3.3 Murkey on 27 Aug 2008 - 20:26
Why not try a lunar base on Mars?
#3.4 Airlink on 28 Aug 2008 - 06:20
(Murkey said @ #3.3)
Why not try a lunar base on Mars?

Well, duh! Then it wouldn't be a lunar base! It would be a martian base.
(2 replies) #4 +Shadrack on 27 Aug 2008 - 17:36
Did the guy actually have a working implementation of visual voicemail? I'm against people just dreaming **** up and creating patents. If you do not have a means to implement what is described in the patent, you should lose it.
#4.1 SirEvan on 27 Aug 2008 - 18:18
(Shadrack said @ #4)
Did the guy actually have a working implementation of visual voicemail? I'm against people just dreaming **** up and creating patents. If you do not have a means to implement what is described in the patent, you should lose it.


Just because someone can't immediately conceptualize an idea, doesn't mean they shouldn't get the patent. A patent is to protect your idea while you figure out how you can realize that idea. I've had a number of ideas, but haven't tried to apply for a patent because I had no idea how I would ever produce something.
#4.2 +Shadrack on 27 Aug 2008 - 21:39
(SirEvan said @ #4.1)
(Shadrack said @ #4)
Did the guy actually have a working implementation of visual voicemail? I'm against people just dreaming **** up and creating patents. If you do not have a means to implement what is described in the patent, you should lose it.


Just because someone can't immediately conceptualize an idea, doesn't mean they shouldn't get the patent. A patent is to protect your idea while you figure out how you can realize that idea. I've had a number of ideas, but haven't tried to apply for a patent because I had no idea how I would ever produce something.


I disagree. There needs to be a way to challenge a patent holder when they do not produce the patented idea.
#5 majortom1981 on 27 Aug 2008 - 19:11
He started getting the patents in 1992. This is genuine. He came up with the idea i think before it would have been able to be done cheaply if at all.
#6 WICKO on 27 Aug 2008 - 21:07
Even though he had applied for those patents so long ago, this seems WAY too general. Even so, shouldn't these companies be doing some research into this kind of thing first? I guess they hope these people won't notice or figure the cost to fight them in court/settle is less than acquiring the patent properly (not really sure what that would entail though, I guess the patent owner would want to go on some kind of royalty system rather than a lump sum).
(1 reply) #7 +warwagon on 28 Aug 2008 - 04:12
I want to patent taking a ****. I'm going to be rich!!
#7.1 Airlink on 28 Aug 2008 - 06:21
Except we'd all have to pay you in ****. And then you'd be covered in ****.
#8 Tzimisce on 28 Aug 2008 - 18:10
I'm going to patent breathing... It is a mechanical action so yeah, I invented it.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)