Security experts are warning RealPlayer users to stop using Internet Explorer until a patch is released for a flaw researchers discovered which could allow code execution. Researcher Elazar Broad has posted to the Full Disclosure mailing list a so-called heap overflow vulnerability that makes it possible for an attacker to modify heap blocks after they are freed and overwrite certain registers.
This could allow code execution on a compromised machine. The vulnerability affects all versions of RealPlayer running under Internet Explorer. Exploit code for this flaw has not yet been made public.
This could allow code execution on a compromised machine. The vulnerability affects all versions of RealPlayer running under Internet Explorer. Exploit code for this flaw has not yet been made public.
Without a patch from RealPlayer, security experts recommend disabling the killbit for the following ActiveX ClassIDs:
- 2F542A2E-EDC9-4BF7-8CB1-87C9919F7F93
- CFCDAA03-8BE4-11CF-B84B-0020AFBBCCFA
However, disabling these killbits will also remove some functionality within the player.
To avoid the loss of functionality, security experts recommend using RealPlayer in a browser that doesn't support ActiveX, such as Mozilla Firefox (for Windows and Mac).
News Source: ZDNet Australia
+1
+1
+2. The only reason I've got it installed is because some people still use their formats online, and Real/Quicktime Alternative won't work online, so I've got Quicktime installed as well.
Speaking of formats, I was left puzzled earlier this week wondering why almost everyone uses .avi over .wmv. I converted some videos from .avi to .wmv using Any Video Converter, kept it at the same resolution and quality. In .avi, the files totaled 2.64GB, but in .wmv, I saved over 1GB! It was exactly the same as well, playback wise.
+1
+2. The only reason I've got it installed is because some people still use their formats online, and Real/Quicktime Alternative won't work online, so I've got Quicktime installed as well.
Speaking of formats, I was left puzzled earlier this week wondering why almost everyone uses .avi over .wmv. I converted some videos from .avi to .wmv using Any Video Converter, kept it at the same resolution and quality. In .avi, the files totaled 2.64GB, but in .wmv, I saved over 1GB! It was exactly the same as well, playback wise.
Because Divx and xvid is a major format... which is cross platform... WMV is semi cross platform... mainly apple and windows... divx is supported by dvd players too generally
As for RealPlayer itself, who in the world still uses it? I haven't seen it in my town for quite some time.
As for RealPlayer itself, who in the world still uses it? I haven't seen it in my town for quite some time.
You can send an e-mail to the content provider and tell them you won't use it 'til it's in a better format, but it probably wouldn't help.
Of course, the following is true as well....
"Good Lord.... Who uses Internet Explorer anymore... If you haven't yet, stop using it..."
Of course, the following is true as well....
"Good Lord.... Who uses Internet Explorer anymore... If you haven't yet, stop using it..."
can't say that when the majority of the market uses it
Of course, the following is true as well....
"Good Lord.... Who uses Internet Explorer anymore... If you haven't yet, stop using it..."
can't say that when the majority of the market uses it
I'd love to know where that % comes from, nobody I know allows it on any of the networks they manage nor do we allow it.
Source please?
Of course, the following is true as well....
"Good Lord.... Who uses Internet Explorer anymore... If you haven't yet, stop using it..."
can't say that when the majority of the market uses it
I'd love to know where that % comes from, nobody I know allows it on any of the networks they manage nor do we allow it.
Source please?
this actually got my interest as well so I googled it. I found lots here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers
I really can't understand this reflex behavior every time RP is mentioned. Yes, we get it, it's not widely used anymore, and you don't like it / never liked it. Is it really worth telling everyone so, yet again? I just don't see what anyone gains from that.
FWIW, I find RP quite useful on Linux (and Windows, when at work). I don't agree whatsoever that it's bloated, compare its resource usage with WMP10 FFS. The unnecessary UI components and the legendary (but much overhyped IMHO) adware content can be disabled in about a minute on first setup, and then you just have a nice small-form-factor media and streaming client that, in my experience, works quite reliably for as long as I need it.
It may not be very cutting-edge these days, but it still seems to do its job quite adequately. Interesting to note that when I tried going to YouTube's mobile site on my new Nokia's mobile browser the other day, the video didn't load in the included MiniFlashPlayer, but in RealPlayer! So I guess it's not quite out of the game yet, eh?
Anyway, on-topic for a moment... who on earth uses Internet Explorer these days? <ducks>
The only times I've seen RealPlayer is when it comes pre-installed on a computer.
What point is there in the software? Flash / WMV / QT is pretty much the standard for Internet video.
I actually *love* the fact that WMV use is dropping as well in favor of more Flash based videos.
Real Alternative is a must have for those rare occasions you need to view RM content. I also recommend Quicktime Alternative by the same author.
It's so hard to choose. Do I keep the best web browser for Windows or a crummy media player I haven't launched in years?
Now, let me think about it.....
Unfortunately the BBC still insists on using real player for some things on their website, although thankfully they seem to be moving away and going with WMP and flash these days...
Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!
Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.