main

Microsoft, Yahoo said in instant message deal

Michael Stanclift   on 12 October 2005 - 12:44 · 56 comments & 22616 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc. have agreed to make their two instant-messaging programs work together, a partnership that could threaten market leader America Online, people familiar with the situation said.

The deal was expected to be announced early Wednesday, these people told The Associated Press. One of them works closely with Microsoft. The other was briefed on the deal. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose details.

A Yahoo-Microsoft partnership, allowing users of the competing services to exchange messages seamlessly, would give the two companies nearly as many users combined as AOL has in total.

AOL’s instant-messaging product, AIM, had some 51.5 million unique U.S. users in September, compared to about 27.3 million for the competing MSN Messenger and 21.9 million for Yahoo’s Messenger, according to Nielsen/NetRatings.

News source: MSNBC


Version 3.51
Bugs fixed:
  • Fixed two vulnerabilities, which could be exploited with specially crafted ACE and UUE/XXE archives;
  • Previous version did not delete some of temporary files;
  • WinRAR could crash when processing very long (more than 1024 characters) archive name parameter in the command line.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 56 additional comments
(2 replies) #1 RaisedFist on 12 Oct 2005 - 12:55
WOW .. the first to comment.

It's a good idea. I really like the way MSN is doing web cam and I wanted that in yahoo messenger. Now, let's wait and see the results.
#1.1 C-Fu on 12 Oct 2005 - 20:50
congrats on the first comment yeah!!!!!!!
#1.2 theyarecomingforyou on 14 Oct 2005 - 14:43
QUOTE
WOW .. the first to comment.


What an achievement... right up there with splitting the atom.
#2 stezo2k on 12 Oct 2005 - 12:56
thats a great idea... hopefully it wont make the program worse
(3 replies) #3 exit on 12 Oct 2005 - 12:59
There will only be one messenger in the future and MS will be it
After MS gains control over all the other messengers it will
Be the defacto state controlled by MS
#3.1 RiddickRom on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:01
QUOTE
There will only be one messenger in the future and MS will be it
After MS gains control over all the other messengers it will
Be the defacto state controlled by MS


I don't think that will be the case. MS really missed the boat with IM, considering Windows comes with Messenger built in they should have dominated the market but I suspect they didn't see the importance of it until it was too late.

Merging is a very smart move but my money is on Googles IM which is just like all the other Google services, clean and easy to use. The way it is being tied into its other services is a major plus too.
#3.2 markjensen on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:52
QUOTE
MS really missed the boat with IM

If you think that Microsoft missed the boat, then you would have to agree that currently Google is even further behind!

Their product has just recently launched, and is little more than a plain-vanilla implementation of an open IM protocol. People into searches might like a simple to-the-point experience, but IM customers like the bells and whistles.

At this point, it is an interesting race to gain market.
#3.3 RiddickRom on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:58
QUOTE
If you think that Microsoft missed the boat, then you would have to agree that currently Google is even further behind!


I agree, Google is nowhere with its client right now but its not really been a problem for Google to come from nowhere with their services. Googles news, email, desktop search and stuff they've aquired has all done extremely well. The idea of having Googles IM tied into your Gmail and who knows what other services further down the road seems to me to be a much better approach than to just keep on racking on fluff to the core of the program to keep users interested.

As for people wanting bells and whistles from IM, I'm not sure that is true at all. I don't agree at all that tools have to take on ever more features to stay useful. If something does what I want it to at V1, apart from bug fixes where is the need to continue to upgrade? Newbies like their software as uncluttered and easy to use as possible, seasoned users appreciate less bloat in software, espectially software that is designed to run all the time.
#4 kronik on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:04
I'm no expert on the issue but I was just wondering how they plan to combine two very different protocols in one, will it be one protocol with the best of both worlds or two seperate protocols with 2-way compatiability.
(2 replies) #5 someotherguy582 on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:05
w00t, this sounds like a great idea. Like stezo2k said, I hope it doesnt make MSN worse. I hope they really implement it smoothly and seemlessy.
#5.1 Mongrel on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:36
Actually, I'm more worried about Yahoo getting bloated - or fugly - like MSN. I really like Yahoo now, but it'd be nice to have them combined instead of needing Trillian at work.
#5.2 Mongrel on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:37
Actually, I'm more worried about Yahoo getting bloated - or fugly - like MSN. I really like Yahoo now, but it'd be nice to have them integrated instead of needing Trillian at work.
#6 Computer Guru on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:05
No, its nnot a program thing. Its a network thing. Way to go MS. Swallow your pride and be the first to deliver!
#7 M2Ys4U on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:06
Nobody I know uses AIM anyways, it's all MSNM
#8 RADicaLMMS on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:12
Finally I can dump Windows Messenger too and use Yahoo! Messenger all the time. I love the tight integration Yahoo! messenger has with Yahoo! Music, it streams great!

Maybe MSN will finally support offline messages like Yahoo! has done for years.
(1 reply) #9 cmn on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:17
just wanted to say, that the AOL users are ICQ and AIM. not AIM alone.
#9.1 roadwarrior on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:57
And iChat as well.
(2 replies) #10 KayMan2K on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:17
QUOTE
A Yahoo-Microsoft partnership, allowing users of the competing services to exchange messages seamlessly, would give the two companies nearly as many users combined as AOL has in total.


This is a deceiving number because the same person may have one or more accounts on each network. So while the number of registered screen names increases, the actual user base may not increase nearly as much (although an increase is certain).
#10.1 Computer Guru on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:24
BUT, unlike AIM where you can make screennames on the fly, with MSN and Yahoo you need to actually sign up for email, etc.

I have 6 AIM screennames in a given year. I hate AIM.

My friends have 10+ total. each.
#10.2 roadwarrior on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:59
With Yahoo, you can have multiple identities tied to a single screen name, and create those on the fly as well.
#11 EL on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:20
WOW this was a freaking good move by yahoo and microsoft
#12 Computer Guru on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:23
it looks like the feedback is all good. Way to go MS!
#13 peacemf on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:32
people use AIM?? yanks i bet
(1 reply) #14 PlainLazy on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:33
So it was true after all, great news. I've always wanted MSN to implement some features that Yahoo has had for a few years now.
#14.1 Silence on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:47
.
#15 lotus22 on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:43
Most everyone in college uses AIM for its away message capabilities.
#16 xUnix on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:45
That would e very cool..
(1 reply) #17 justdarick on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:46
wasn't there news of msn and aol "working together"... this could be a lead in to bigger discussions

AIM/MSN/YAHOO take on Google
#17.1 Radium on 14 Oct 2005 - 00:19
That's about the MSN and AOL dail-up services.
#18 seebaran on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:47
The "talked" before years ago about doing this but nothing happened. I hope this happens for real this time. It'd be nice if Yahoo I.D. can be added to my MSN Messenger by just typing their Yahoo e-mail address instead of a seperate box that would further clutter the interface.

Slightly OT, has anyone seen the new AIM Triton (SP?). It's much better than before still needs a little less traffic on its interface. I see they got the radio feature out before MSN Messenger. I hope Messenger 8 will be able to support both MSN Radio and MSN Video. That'd be groovy. I made a ghetto looking mock up of Messenger 8 based on other's mock ups I'd like to share. I'll post them in the forums later.
(1 reply) #19 Silence on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:47
I use AIM, ICQ, MSN, and Yahoo, and I don't even notice a difference thanks to GAIM. Otherwise I would be way more selective. But since gaim gives me the same simple look that I want, I couldn't care less about which protocol I use. The only REAL difference is that icq and yahoo support offline messaging, something I think should be a norm in IM... not quite sure why MSN and AIM don't have it.

As for the following:
QUOTE

AOL’s instant-messaging product, AIM, had some 51.5 million unique U.S. users in September, compared to about 27.3 million for the competing MSN Messenger and 21.9 million for Yahoo’s Messenger, according to Nielsen/NetRatings.


I'm wondering where those 21.9 million US yahoo messenger users are. I know ONE person in the US that uses it. If it's non-us, then I'd understand it because Yahoo is way more popular in east asia.
#19.1 roadwarrior on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:02
I guess you've never looked at the chat rooms on Yahoo. Unfortunately, those numbers may be a little off because of all the spam-bots that infest the chat rooms.
#20 jp10558 on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:49
Everyone I know uses AIM, so this really doesn't affect us unless they also open up. Personally, I use Trillian though, so I could change networks eaisily enough.
(1 reply) #21 Jase on 12 Oct 2005 - 13:50
worst idea ever.
#21.1 Matt500 on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:19
why?
#22 DJ Prem on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:10
#23 brianshapiro on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:22
and remember, msn was reportedly in talks to buy aol
(1 reply) #24 Jase on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:32
QUOTE
why?


if msnM and Yahoo team up its going to bloat the hell out of the messenger. EG: when you click search you will want to search say either msn search but then oh woops you are searching yahoo

this is just like asking big famous stars to star in a new movie so that it would get high ratings, its very poor way of seeking attention, i say microsoft stay with themselfs and do not team up with yahoo.

as i said, MsnM are perfectly fine.

that is why
#24.1 Rodrigo on 12 Oct 2005 - 23:23
Ehmm... no.

I think you are missing the point here.

Where does it say that they will make some Mahoo Messenger (read it somewhere in the forum !).

So that being stated, when you search over your MSN Messenger, you will get your results with msn.com, same with Yahoo Messenger which will deliver your search results in yahoo.com.

You will just have the possibility to add and talk with Yahoo contacts, and viceversa.
#25 Lexcyn on 12 Oct 2005 - 14:40
Good idea! Hopefully the implimentation goes smoothly.
#26 quigley0 on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:05
A step in the right direction, but, not enough. All IM should be compatable. Just like email. How stupid would it be if Hotmail couldn't send an email to gmail, etc. If you use outlook, you can't receive email from Thunderbird. That is the state of IM right now. Email is seemless (well, almost), and IM needs to get there. Pick a port, pick a protocol, and everyone use it
(1 reply) #27 DarkBlade on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:11
Nice...maybe this'll get more of my friends to start using MSN. Most of my friends use AIM, and I can't stand AIM.
#27.1 xpgeek on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:37
Same here I can't stand AIM.
#28 LanMan874 on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:17
Very good idea i must say.
#29 mad_onion on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:29
wow this is great news. as long as the messengers are still seperate there wont be just one will there? i hope not
(1 reply) #30 Mando on 12 Oct 2005 - 15:45
people people

They arn't merging the two IM protocols or applications into the same app they are just going to make MSN & BTYahoo messenger compatible to each others network/protocols. This has been in the pipeline all this year and is at last properly announced.

This is fairly easy to do (Trillian and Gaim and countless Linux IMs have been doing it for years)

Allowing a 3rd party app to access a closed IM protocol this is all this news is about.
Neither MS or Yahoo would be willing to give up their customer base in IM.

AOL has such a big consumer base due to the fact that AIM is built into the AOL Portal software.
#30.1 parithon on 12 Oct 2005 - 18:24
MS also has a IM platform that can communicate with all the "networks" for the enterprise called "MS Communicator". The move for MSN Messenger is the next logical step.
(1 reply) #31 tlogank on 12 Oct 2005 - 16:25
that's great that AIM has more user's than Yahoo! and MSN combined still...
#31.1 j0j081 on 13 Oct 2005 - 00:41
I am actually suprised Yahoo/MSN combined will nearly equal AIM. AIM has been the chat prog of choice for little kids for years now. It moreso shows how the other two are catching up do to a better product.
(2 replies) #32 asellus on 12 Oct 2005 - 17:09
Some people thinks that this move is nothing new, by pointing out that software like Trillian has already allowed cross-network communications. But this one is different. All you need is a MSN or Yahoo! account, and you are set to go. Even with Trillian and co., you will still need an account for each network (meaning: more usernames and password to remember).

Plus, with this deal, people can actually uses their emoticons, winks, file transfers, video conferencing, voice talks etc seamlessly, and these features can't be replicated by Trillian and GAIM (that goddamn file transfer in GAIM never works).

AOL may have a large userbase in America, but in East and Sout-east Asia (where I lived) where MSN and Yahoo! simply has 90%++ of the userbase, AIM can be considered extinct already with this deal. All is left is Skype (Google Talk is a no contest at all).
#32.1 LanMan874 on 12 Oct 2005 - 20:49
QUOTE
AOL may have a large userbase in America, but in East and Sout-east Asia (where I lived) where MSN and Yahoo! simply has 90%++ of the userbase, AIM can be considered extinct already with this deal. All is left is Skype (Google Talk is a no contest at all).


In the UK (and maybe even Europe-wide) MSN is much more popular than AOL (i say AOL to mean AIM, ICQ etc). So i only think AOL IM's are big in the US.
#32.2 FuhrerDarqueSyde on 14 Oct 2005 - 16:42
All my friends here in the US; AIM (also have msn and yahoo accts they never use )
All my british or misc overseas friends; MSN

i really have like 8 people on my yahoo compared to around 108 on aim and 70 or so on MSN
#33 lylesback2 on 12 Oct 2005 - 20:24
thats awesome! if MSN Messenger and Yahoo worked together, they'd own google IM
#34 lester_kun on 12 Oct 2005 - 21:01
I hope they both merge the protocols... offline messaging rocks. And with some improvements brought from Messenger Plus! and Y!Tunnel, and some freeform skinning, well, that will be THE messenger service. Period.
#35 mynimal on 12 Oct 2005 - 21:12
Nice to see big corporations working together for once.
#36 dextro on 13 Oct 2005 - 11:56
Like it's been said I hope people realise they aren't doing a thing to the software, the only new thing they are doing is like a bridge beetween both IM Protocols so let's say .NET Passport user xxx@hotmail.com could add to it's list Yahoo messenger user xxx@yahoo.com, or the other way arround... Simple as that! It's not some huge new thing, it's just the simple next logical step...

Of course some day one of the protocols will eventually take over... It's they way of the world (unfourtnatly).

PS: You don't need an hotmail account to use MSN/Windows messenger (aka :NET Passport account) btw

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)