ces
Report a problem

3-D television coming to a home near you

Matthew Hopson   on 12 January 2009 - 15:54 · 18 comments & 8425 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Television viewers could find themselves able to watch movies in three dimensions as soon as 2010, as television manufacturers showed off a variety of three dimensional prototypes at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas last week.

At the show, Panasonic Corp. demonstrated a plasma screen that could display animated movies and footage from the Olympics in high-definition 3-D. The television switched between images for the left and right eye extremely quickly, while viewers had to wear battery-powered glasses that alternately blacked out the view for each eye, allowing the viewer to see the picture in three dimensions.

Samsung Electronics Co., Sony Corp. and LG Electronics Inc, the remaining three of the top four TV manufacturers in the U.S, also had 3-D televisions at their booths.

According to the Associated Press, Richard Doherty, an analyst with Envisioneering Group, said that the industry's drive to make larger screens has run up against the limits of what people are willing to buy and that television manufacturers are needing to add something else in order to keep people interested in new TVs.

The industry however, needs a standard for 3-D broadcasts, if it is to avoid another format-war like the one between Blu-ray and HD-DVD, or VHS and Betamax. Fortunately, Panasonic hopes to solve that problem this year, by creating standards for television broadcasts as well as discs.

During an address at CES last Wednesday, Yoshi Yamada said, "Panasonic doesn't think that 3-D, full HD for the home is far away at all. We are discussing this now with other major manufacturers and Hollywood studios. But for 3-D, full HD systems to succeed, we know that there needs to be 3-D, full HD content."

Unfortunately, glasses are still a necessity of watching 3D television. Or are they? 3M Co. and Toshiba also showed off some 3-D screens at the show, but their screens did not require glasses for the 3-D effect. The technology is made possible by a thin film made by 3M, which can beam light selectively to the right and left eyes of the viewer. The idea behind the film is similar to the old postcards that could create a 3-D effect with a ribbed plastic covering, except the new film goes inside the screen and is invisible to the viewer.

Senior technology manager, William Bryan said that the film will be available this year and that if manufacturers are willing to adopt it, there could be 3-D capable mobile phones available by Christmas. Unfortunately, the technology is stuck at the chicken and egg stage - "The content people haven't been willing to do a lot of content because there have been no displays," said Bryan.

Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 18 additional comments
(3 replies) #1 este on 12 Jan 2009 - 19:40
Television viewers could find themselves able to watch movies in three dimensions as soon as 2010

2010.. probably not .. the Obama administration will only delay this as well
#1.1 vetEmuZombie on 12 Jan 2009 - 19:49
The Obama administration is in charge of the entire world now? Wow... where have I been?...
#1.2 ermax on 12 Jan 2009 - 20:06
Hahaha. Took the words right out of my mouth este. If everyone can't have 3D TV then no one can. We all have to have equal opportunities now. As if we don't already. Hahaha.
#1.3 DClark on 13 Jan 2009 - 02:13
ermax said,
Hahaha. Took the words right out of my mouth este. If everyone can't have 3D TV then no one can. We all have to have equal opportunities now. As if we don't already. Hahaha.

As the great Thomas Jefferson said, we are to be provided equal opportunity, not equal outcomes.
(2 replies) #2 SierraSonic on 12 Jan 2009 - 19:49
Nice, I can't wait for a 3D 32 inch 240Hz SHDTV to be affordable. Imagine how TV programming will evolve.
#2.1 Raa on 12 Jan 2009 - 23:13
Obviously you've been sucked into the Hz myth.
#2.2 AUSSIE_FLOYD_FAN on 15 Oct 2009 - 06:14
Raa said,
Obviously you've been sucked into the Hz myth.

like the 600hz tvs?
(3 replies) #3 +Chipshop on 12 Jan 2009 - 20:03
"Be able to" and "be able to afford to" are two completley different things! :p
#3.1 DigitalDude on 12 Jan 2009 - 21:10
I know I can't even afford an HDTV let alone a 3d one.
#3.2 Raa on 12 Jan 2009 - 23:13
Which is why "Full HD" tvs aren't taking off. If TV makers want ppl to buy their TVs, drop the prices!
#3.3 +Xerxes on 13 Jan 2009 - 01:21
Raa said,
Which is why "Full HD" tvs aren't taking off. If TV makers want ppl to buy their TVs, drop the prices!

That is exactly why I feel 3-D television will probably fail. Sure the idea is cool, but considering people are only now starting to get HDTVs, what makes them think they'll buy another expensive TV in a few years time? and the current economic situation only makes it worse. Good idea, but bad timing.
#4 Electric Bolt on 12 Jan 2009 - 20:58
I hope the 3D screens succeed, they sound like the only thing usable, I will never wear 3D glasses everytime I want to watch something 3D, it would get boring and hurt the eyes. I have worn 3D glasses before and they are uncomfortable for most of the time you are wearing them. 3D Screens sound like something comfortable, fun, and futuristic! Can't wait!
#5 xXTOKERXx on 12 Jan 2009 - 21:18
This isn't new,

Zalman launched their 3D monitors over a year ago and are very impressive, they use polarization technology, you again have to wear glasses but these are not electrical and use filters (They basically look like a pair of cheap sunglasses).

This works very well and is compatible with most games, so long as they can play with a certain resolution and you have an Nvidia graphics card.

However, the 3D screens which do not require glasses are something that really interest me, glasses are okay, for a gamer playing games, but when it comes to normal tv, means everytime you walk into the room on go a pair of glasses.

I feel like this is old news and really suprised that other manufacturers haven't been recognised for their 3D success.

#6 McDave on 13 Jan 2009 - 02:29
I don't like the idea of having screens flash images at us, does not sound very healthy. Eye strain is bad enough problem as it is.
(1 reply) #7 LaP on 13 Jan 2009 - 15:47
Current screens already "flash" images at you. 3D screen just flash a different set of images for the left and right eye.
#7.1 xXTOKERXx on 13 Jan 2009 - 18:08
This is true, unfortunately the nature of 3d flashes seem to cause a lot more headaches.
#8 james shaffer on 20 Oct 2009 - 06:08
Nice, I can't wait for a 3D 32 inch 240Hz SHDTV to be affordable. Imagine how TV programming will evolve.

auto insurance quotes
#9 PrudentPanda on 02 Nov 2009 - 01:31
That's great. But I wonder, is it true that 3D TV can damage our vision more severe? I hope it is not so. But I rarely see people here buying 3D TV.
free classified ads, jobs, bathroom vanities

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)