gamers

XBox price cut pays off for Microsoft

NTUsEr   on 24 July 2002 - 12:30 · 28 comments & 1665 views

Advertisement (Why?)
Slashing the price of XBOX helped Microsoft more than double sales of the console in two months according to new market data.

NPD says Xbox sales jumped 131 per cent after the software company and hardware dabbler followed Sony's lead and cut $100 off the price in May.

Microsoft also managed to shift more than 10 million games world-wide in the first eight months the console was on the market, the researcher says.

Microsoft has also announced it is to bring the console to a bunch of new territories, including South Korea Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, New Zealand and Mexico. It currently sells in the United States, Japan, Western Europe and Australia.

News source: The Inquirer


Anyone whose computer was damaged in the process must receive the permission of the U.S. attorney general before filing a lawsuit, and a suit could be filed only if the actual monetary loss was more than $250.

According to the draft, the attorney general must be given complete details about the "specific technologies the copyright holder intends to use to impair" the normal operation of the peer-to-peer network. Those details would remain secret and would not be divulged to the public.

The draft bill doesn't specify what techniques, such as viruses, worms, denial-of-service attacks, or domain name hijacking, would be permissible. It does say that a copyright-hacker should not delete files, but it limits the right of anyone subject to an intrusion to sue if files are accidentally erased.

Because Congress only has about five work weeks left before it is scheduled to adjourn for the year, the outlook for the draft bill is uncertain.

But because its sponsors include top Republican and Democratic committee chairmen, it could receive a warm welcome in the House of Representatives at a hearing tentatively scheduled for this fall. Coble is the chairman of the House subcommittee on intellectual property, and Berman is the top Democrat on the panel.

Berman wrote in an opinion article this month that "currently, copyright owners are unable to use some useful technological tools to deal with P2P piracy because they face potential, if unintended, liability under a variety of state and federal laws."

"It's a good bill," Gene Smith, a spokeswoman for Berman, said on Monday. "It's always hard to defend theft and piracy--this bill just puts into the hands of the copyright owners technologies that are already being used by the pirates."

Smith said the purpose of the draft bill was to "fight fire with fire, fight technology with technology."

Jessica Litman, a professor at Wayne State University who specializes in copyright law, said the draft bill improperly encourages "vigilante justice."

"I think it's wildly overreaching," Litman said. "Copyright owners are in essence asking Congress to say that peer-to-peer file trading is such a scourge, is so bad, that stopping it is more important than enforcing any other laws that federal or state governments may have passed on computer security, privacy, fraud and so forth."

Litman said that even if a copyright holder accidentally deleted a home video titled "Snow White," the owner of that PC could be out of luck. "Unless I can show economic harm, I can't even be compensated," Litman said. "Even if I want to be compensated, I have to jump through procedural hoops."

The film and music industries already are developing tools to use against rogue file swapping, though they've remained mum on the details. The RIAA says its members have the right to use any "lawful and appropriate self-help measure."

Fritz Attaway, the MPAA's senior vice president for government relations, endorsed Berman's approach on Monday, stressing that law-abiding Internet users should not be concerned.

"No one in the motion picture industry has any interest in invading your computer or doing anything malicious with your files," Attaway said. "The idea is to make unauthorized file sharing sufficiently inconvenient or at least unsuccessful."

The MPAA and RIAA did not respond to requests for comment on Tuesday.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation condemned the draft bill as a sop to Hollywood and the recording industry.

Digital lockdown?
"This is part of a greater strategy that's being implemented by the entertainment industry to lock up and control digital information in general," said Robin Gross, an EFF staff attorney. "The rights that we've enjoyed in the analog space are now being taken away from us because we're entering a digital realm"

Gross said she was concerned by the broad grant of immunity to copyright holders who become computer intruders. "When they screw up, they don't want you to be able to get some sort of retribution from them," she said.

Other sponsors listed on the draft bill include key legislators such as Reps. John Conyers of Michigan, the top Democrat on the full Judiciary committee, Lamar Smith, R-Texas, the chairman of a crime subcommittee, and Robert Wexler, D-Fla. Currently there is no companion legislation in the Senate.

The next step for the draft bill is the House Judiciary subcommittee on intellectual property. A representative for Coble said earlier this month to expect a hearing starting in September, when Congress returns from its August recess.

Berman announced plans for the legislation during a speech to a Washington trade association last month. He represents California's San Fernando Valley, adjacent to Los Angeles and Hollywood's cluster of entertainment companies.

Coble and Berman have jointly written a second draft bill that could sharply limit Americans' rights relating to copying music, taping TV shows, or transferring files through the Internet. But they have said they do not necessarily endorse the plan's details.



Post a comment · Send to friend Comments · There are 28 additional comments
(4 replies) #1 vetDazzla on 24 Jul 2002 - 12:38
An increase of 131% on dire sales figures isn't impressive. I would be very worried if it wasn't over 100% increase. Oh, just to finish off the article, all consoles saw increases in sales, Nintendo are the most successful poublishers with 2.55 million units sold this year. Sony still have an unassailable lead as well, this generation of console wars if already over.
#1.1 neo1980 on 24 Jul 2002 - 20:26
u r dumb
#1.2 kether2012 on 24 Jul 2002 - 21:01
er.. shame on you

Last edited by 321 on 24 Jul 2002 - 23:21
#1.3 vetDazzla on 24 Jul 2002 - 23:10
You might want to rethink that statement Neo, flaming a moderator isn't a wise choice.
#1.4 vetDazzla on 24 Jul 2002 - 23:35
Lol @ kether2012, I saw that sneaky change
#2 protomor on 24 Jul 2002 - 13:41
xbox... its gonna become just like sega except sega didnt make computer software.
(5 replies) #3 giantsnyy2002 on 24 Jul 2002 - 14:53
haha... Xbox sucked so much, i returned it before i opened it (and i really did too). I completely wasted 300 dollars on that. (Xbox+Halo+Protection Plan).
#3.1 Tom Servo on 24 Jul 2002 - 15:05
So you must have been really disappointed by the XBox if you didnt even use yours.
#3.2 NeoMoose on 24 Jul 2002 - 17:11
[quote]haha... Xbox sucked so much, i returned it before i opened it (and i really did too). I completely wasted 300 dollars on that. (Xbox+Halo+Protection Plan). [/quote] You are a damn fool for doing that. Xbox is great.
#3.3 neo1980 on 24 Jul 2002 - 20:28
ur from NY arent u? yeah i figured that by ur IQ
#3.4 vetDazzla on 24 Jul 2002 - 23:11
"ur" IQ can't be that high either if you do things like substitute "you" for "u" and "your" for "ur"...
#3.5 MaxPayne1357 on 25 Jul 2002 - 05:04
Im guessing u got this xbox as a gift or something cause why the hell would u buy an xbox in the first place then? xbox is a great console and shame on all you for bashing it just because it happens to be made by Microsoft.
#4 lexor on 24 Jul 2002 - 15:16
Why does everyone compares XBox to PS2 and GC? Those are second or greater generation platforms for those companies. XBox is the first generation console for Microsoft so it should be compared with first generation PS, Nintendo, and Sega releases! Those were just as powerful by the standards of those days, and they were the first ones to enter the market for the companies and those figures should be more relevant to MS case.
(2 replies) #5 Spectre on 24 Jul 2002 - 15:42
[quote]Nintendo are the most successful poublishers with 2.55 million units sold this year.[/quote] you gotta be kidding me ... ever looked at the PS2 sales numbers?
#5.1 username on 24 Jul 2002 - 16:54
"PS2" is not a publisher
#5.2 vetDazzla on 24 Jul 2002 - 17:03
Like username said, which part of [b]"PUBLISHER"[/b] didn't you understand?
#6 NeoMoose on 24 Jul 2002 - 17:05
Xbox is life aside from my VoodooPC
#7 NeoMoose on 24 Jul 2002 - 17:06
[quote]you gotta be kidding me ... ever looked at the PS2 sales numbers?[/quote] As a publisher - Nintendo sold more GAMES not systems.
#8 Denus on 24 Jul 2002 - 21:55
I will buy an X-box very soon: I like this console....
#9 EmuZombie on 24 Jul 2002 - 23:23
and you know what I find the most ammusing? Sony became Nintendo's main competetor, but yet back a in the early 90's Nintendo and Sony were working together to make a CD add-on for Super Nintendo to compete with Sega's CD add-on for the mega-drive (aka genesis). But Nintendo pulled out of the deal at the last minute after Sega's CD add-on turned out to be a major flopp. Sony took that early SNES-CD system and developed it into Playstation. That'll teach Nintendo
#10 Spectre on 24 Jul 2002 - 23:51
woops! sounded odd enough. i'm tired
(1 reply) #11 ILMagic on 25 Jul 2002 - 05:26
Thats because nintendo is the only game company that puts out good games for the GC.
#11.1 vetDazzla on 25 Jul 2002 - 17:57
Yeah, I bet that's exactly what Microsoft thought when they tried to buy Squaresoft and Sega...
#12 Jstphish on 25 Jul 2002 - 19:11
Lets face it, all of the systems are great now.
#13 mimeryme on 25 Jul 2002 - 20:03
I like what Jstphish said. Console wars are great for consumers (competitive pricing, don't forget the ludicrous price of the PS and Saturn when they first came out), but I've always hated taking sides. SEGA had a huge ad campaign saying that Genesis does what Nintendon't. I hated SEGA for that. Didn't keep me from playing EA's NHL series on the Genesis though. Btw, is it a requirement for a console "fanboy" to hate all other competitiion consoles? That seems to be the trend and it sucks.
#14 mimeryme on 25 Jul 2002 - 20:04
dang, busy server = double post. my bad.
#15 drom on 26 Jul 2002 - 05:55
i agree with Jstphish, all the systems are great right now i have them all and i love all of them.
#16 rpeterclark on 26 Jul 2002 - 12:07
Check out The Register's version of this news, they got a few more specific numbers... [url=http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/26359.html]http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/54/26359.html[/url] They say that the percentage gain the XBox recieved as a result of the price cuts was the greatest among the 3 consoles. Also that the XBox was the first console ever to have 3 individual million-selling game titles (Halo, DOA3, Project Gotham) shortly after launch. Not too shabby.

Commenting has either been disabled on this article or you are not logged in. Click here to login or register, its free!

Note: Anonymous commenting is disabled in order to keep the quality of responses to a high standard.

Advertisement (Why?)